28–29 October 2026 · Fourth Arabic Natural Language Processing Conference (ArabicNLP 2026, ACL)

Teaching machines to notice a metaphor in Arabic.

AraMIP is a two-stage annotation procedure that extends the Metaphor Identification Procedure VU (MIPVU) with the classical Arabic rhetorical tradition — distinguishing isti‘āra, kināya, and tashbīh at both the word and the construction level.

300 sentences · 5,277 words annotated Sampled from BAREC‑10M CC BY‑NC 4.0 Budapest, Hungary · 28–29 Oct 2026
Stage 1 + 2 annotationexample

كان الرجل مفاجأة لا تنتهي

“The man was a surprise that never ends.”

Stage 1 (MIPVU) MRW-indirect
Stage 2 (Arabic) isti‘āra
Conventionality 1.5 / 5
In plain terms

Metaphors are everywhere in language — “time is money,” a leader who is a “lion” — and computers are increasingly good at spotting them in English. Arabic has been left behind, partly because it has its own, much older toolkit for talking about figurative language, developed over a thousand years by Arabic rhetoric scholars. AraMIP is a step toward closing that gap: it's a rulebook that tells human annotators — and, eventually, AI systems — how to consistently mark which words in an Arabic sentence are being used figuratively, and which of three classical categories (metaphor, an indirect “implied meaning,” or a simile) that figurative language belongs to. The team tested the rulebook on 300 real sentences and used what went wrong to write a clear list of fixes for the next version.

2‑stageWord‑level MIPVU labels, then span‑level rhetorical classification
3Classical categories: isti‘āra, kināya, tashbīh
6Annotators across four Arabic dialect backgrounds
5‑ptConventionality scale for every rhetorical span
The framework

Two stages: first find it, then classify it.

AraMIP keeps full compatibility with MIPVU while adding a second layer grounded in ʿilm al-bayān, the Arabic science of eloquence.

1

Lexical‑unit MIPVU annotation

Every word is checked against its “basic” dictionary meaning and coded for how it's being used in context.

MRW‑directMRW‑indirectMRW‑implicitMFlagWIDLIIDFMA
2

Rhetorical span classification

Metaphor‑bearing words are grouped into full rhetorical constructions and rated for how conventional or novel they are.

isti‘ārakināyatashbīh1–5 conventionality
استعارة
Isti‘āra
metaphor

The literal, “basic” meaning is impossible in context — only the figurative reading survives.

كناية
Kināya
indirect reference · metonymy

Both the literal and figurative meanings stay plausible; the figurative one is simply implied.

تشبيه
Tashbīh
simile

An explicit comparison, usually signalled by a lexical marker such as “like” or “as.”

Publication

AraMIP: Extending MIPVU Towards Metaphor Identification in Arabic

Chicago style

Marathe, Mandar, Ali, Manar, Nabhani, Sara, Abu Ahmad, Raia, Baroud, Ibrahim, and Hassan, Omar Abdelmomen Amin. Accepted. “AraMIP: Extending MIPVU Towards Metaphor Identification in Arabic.” In Proceedings of the Fourth Arabic Natural Language Processing Conference. Budapest, Hungary: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Fourth Arabic Natural Language Processing Conference · ArabicNLP 2026 · Budapest, Hungary, 28–29 October 2026 — an official ACL workshop.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{aramip2026,
title = {AraMIP: Extending {MIPVU} Towards Metaphor Identification in {Arabic}},
author = {Marathe, Mandar and Ali, Manar and Nabhani, Sara and Abu Ahmad, Raia and Baroud, Ibrahim and Hassan, Omar Abdelmomen Amin},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fourth Arabic Natural Language Processing Conference (ArabicNLP 2026)},
year = {2026},
address = {Budapest, Hungary},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
note = {Accepted}
}
Conference presentation

ArabicNLP 2026

28–29 October 2026 · Budapest, Hungary · Fourth Arabic Natural Language Processing Conference, an official ACL workshop.

Slides

Presentation slides

Available after the conference.

Handout

Session handout

Available after the conference.

Recording

Talk recording

Available after the conference.